qwen2-0.5b
A base model — Vulcora reads a model by differencing it against the parent it was derived from, and a base model is the root of that tree, with no parent. The question is category-inapplicable, so there is no verdict: not a pass and not a fail.
◆ Vulcora reads a model against its parent — and a base model has no parent to read against. Nothing to compare, so there is no verdict to give: not applicable, not a clean bill of health
Vulcora reads the weights- model-signingOpenSSF / Sigstoreprovenance
reads Sigstore signature bundles
verifying a cryptographic provenance signature over model files; it can only attest what a publisher signed.
requires a published Sigstore bundle; no scanned model ships one
1 off-the-shelf tool could read this model’s serialized files, and none flagged it. None of them reads what the weights mean: they hunt load-time code-execution, repo smells, or a provenance signature — real jobs, none of which is weight-level tampering. 3 other tools had nothing of the kind they read here. Vulcora reads the weights — offline, and never runs the model.
Think this verdict is wrong?
Signed-in users can formally refute a read — Vulcora re-reads the model against your claim and records the outcome. You'll need an account to file one.
Refutations are actor-gated — a guest can't file one.
Want a verdict you can prove — on your own model?